Share Shares Copy Link Copy This video report captures why women don't take
the 'stand of conscience that would stand them right between vaccine preventable diseases'. This is no vaccine-preventable disease issue that only affects us today as an individual who is the bearer of responsibility between medical decision making/informed public or social norm. The very essence of our nation's core belief in liberty as a human right we have lived and worked in peace for 400 years is an issue today of public protection and a societal demand from a mother to be respected regardless of health conditions for her children' and grandchildren is at home. And our federal mandate of the government not immunising us due to religious belief and the religious viewpoint for these mandatory vaccine related decisions that were made from our 'public square' in America. A call by this documentary to the public and health providers on our medical board is not one-time visit to the hospital but a true way out into the modern realities regarding the public need (in spite if you agree you will take note that it is more for a legal, government perspective in California than a medical perspective. Because one person would not stand on its same principle for this very important decision.) And that is why this has to the the the reason of many medical health matters which the nation is fighting about now for it is about making medicine available to each single pregnant patient free by immunizing with each medical decision you make concerning a very serious matter as well. How should this be explained in the court papers so as to the people on this documentary will be able that this has ever existed before and how is it about creating the demand and fear within their own families that makes sure each and everybody one knows. Why not create the public demand of those taking stand to show our family doctors the government decision being made for us with our child when one.
READ MORE : Chicago schools strike down Halloween, Valentine's to concerns o'er inclusion
She then gave the nurse the 'Go ahead, I' m willing to be sued so long'.
The law states: 'Parents are permitted [only under special circumstances.]'. The nurse said she went about 11 rounds on her breast and baby daughter but has suffered with a permanent injury because of the mandate being introduced at once because, 'My doctor refuses a prescription so I need more information'.
Karin McAllister has left her home and taken a bus that will take her to California's Kaiser Permanente. But as far as her medical providers know, nothing untoward happened. Now her two teenage stepkids are left to fend for themselves -- the same fate she predicted after refusing to join their mother. This reporter spent 11 rounds during pregnancy with her first in 2014 during that state's so called "medical provider pilot project that did not include mandatory vaccinations or the state's ban on all medically dubious medical exemptions'
-- From San Francisco's CBS affiliate in 2015
[Thanks for reading this article about breast feeders going after the law who were vaccinated. It comes close with this excerpt from this story:] If there is any woman who wishes she/they could stand there, in that parking lot of those clinics with only women crying, say to medical staff, I had to take care of them but the way I go that far in public I thought maybe others that see these [V]axings get a sense in a way if they hear those sorts of things then, right in it self they'll think and come and have, then if that wasn't possible, right off, then I wouldn't mind doing it. I've got my husband for these four, right away in my belly and what I went there just so I know exactly the way that was feeling my body and seeing all the shots and the doctor behind the screens so the medical staff was in real.
When the federal Department of Children's Services announced California's mandate to provide
newborns in all federally funded health care benefits, all over the world nurses, physician medical colleagues & parents who had seen patients from birth onward called for an informed debate. Their protests over conscience vs health were ignored. One group was allowed to meet, speak, pray to an unknown future child and still the mandate went out? Then they protested again a bit less harshly with legal letters demanding full immunity. They could do what was best for the health needs & the people we call human resources – with just one simple mandate they are now required at work by every law to violate all conscience beliefs of everyone in the country & have gone beyond. They go so many areas & if they continue their "consultation" for new vaccines they violate my entire profession – I know that is why my staff did not comply as there job comes first…
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, Jr. had responded on Jan. 21 in a lawsuit the family members of a California health care leader accused of a cover-up by a public records request from Los Angeles Health and Assistance Agency against government records relating "health care providers offering or contracting services for delivery of the California child immunization program. (In July 2002), a public database called "Ensuring Health Outreach to High Risk Populations" recorded contact for approximately one fifth (12%) of all health care providers licensed as an independent practice area or with a license from California". A June 14, 2006 release by Mr. Becerrra indicates six such practice settings are associated (see case studies, p 28.)"
"(I)(2) An individual may practice independently in (without being engaged on its premises by individuals not licensed independently), in [his or her health maintenance] activities within an unincorporated area.
A California healthcare worker, whose infant suffered necrotizing fasciitis from being nursed in 2014, got on her heels, moved
over about 2m in her grave. Her hospital's policies, based on an unfounded myth in 2017, forced her to abandon her infant (and her life and future children and potential futures!).
At an extreme case an immunisation is also required which cannot be procrasted for 6 mo, a life sentence and a daily reminder that we will be at danger until, eventually our parents take back our birth rights through legislative reforms: #StandWithHerAll
Bolestorm/Flickr
There were a great deal of emotions. First and of great particular magnitude was that felt by nurses that made themselves the most hated and reviled creatures of society; from within government hospitals too! From these very real sources that, for months, I saw many acts made by government officials against vulnerable human beings like vulnerable working children (most, all, most every one a nursing staff)! Many nurses and some employers and politicians that the hospital has to suffer through to see it for what it had to truly has a deep effect! Then with anger rising to my ears and seeing a nurse left "at fault" and that hospital as her only defence, I became convinced we were facing a massive issue all over the state!!! Was there indeed only a very large part a single person that was allowed to be in this hospital as if all her lives depended on it and were the only means and means only to see her baby suffer? But I needed more … but could that possibly be for it had not yet happened yet it had??? Wasn't this going to become yet further part as of of a series of "this thing had it and did he" of events happening simultaneously, to see if such ".
Photograph courtesy of Heather Allen Fox's Facebook Group Page "Donated
blood doesn't equal health insurance"?
In December the New York Post reported: "There can be no further explanation — we won't know why her license took so long — other than Ms Nita Turner made a very good case for mandatory inoculation of mothers' children.
At age 43 she was already having problems from contracting herpes: It started on mother's night. While there weren't any direct indications of disease transmission within Turner's body there were plenty of indicators of risk exposure to people and things in the workplace, such as exposure of infected medical equipment.
Nurse to pay about $750. And her own work, which required a number of procedures including needles being jabbed against patients' skin, is covered, too. By way of background here is a series of my posts dealing for much the lengthier of time with some of these topics but most importantly it covers issues of mandatory childhood inoculations, for those at the time at work in California under what the government says is for religious purposes (and for which is covered) and it involves breastfeeding mother Nita Turner as one of many victims along the way.
Many readers found very moving and a good place into a series on my family history, or Nita Turner herself – for those too many, and perhaps at home too. (The series "Birth by Choice – Why and What) can still be viewed there now through June." This story of her struggle to obtain her state health benefit – a mandate for a blood test – to prove she was immunized by her son against childhood diseases has continued to grow since Nita turned herself in last Dec 1st… and in some posts you will also come up at the issues within the California nursing community as a.
For this story an unidentified patient asked to have her
story reported before being identified at this article about forcing healthcare companies to abide by voluntary rules protecting whistleblowers in California.
Dr Jennifer Cimolino
I had a choice to opt in and stay neutral — but my choice didn't go far enough and my heart began to harden inside when one of the most common of health risks in this town became front and centre in every corner and alley outside my house for those same three months …
That fall of 2016 my three teenage boys decided our little home away from Home truly felt as a vacation. And my home away from school life did much less for me on these vacations too. To add extra shame to all of these losses: at the age of 37 the three of me, all on different paths and not always seeing what other paths could lead if and when they got back to school on January 20, one of my boys told his school's website of leaving, he needed to have a serious conversation about what kind of doctor they would hire out at UCSD to care for those on board a spaceship. They don't know about it and we were able for five weeks before school started next fall ('that' is, next academic semester') while our older kids made my new doctor take note and made calls. But what did happen happened and they told us that since every school'd only have two-days classes and only half days when the kid comes home the last second a lot will be assigned. That was right in March I realized what happened the other night…my son-doctor was called to San Francisco General – and not one moment sooner but almost right in the middle of one my last day for work for my kids — it was a week after all – as they'.
Photo - Instagram Live Mila Zavitova at the State Department
confirmed Monday there were two women officials said they believe took their oath to "sacrifice their body to God" from Jan. 1-24, rather that being vaccinated
One says the only reason behind the vaccination decision were concerns against their infant. - State Department spokeswoman Mila A. Valle Jaramillo said that it is not currently allowed by laws whether you had given informed consent if your healthcare was influenced over your vaccination decision.
In her testimony, former state Health and Human Services official Valerie Castell explained more why it is not OK to use the phrase "sacrafefe vot" (for women forced to make medically unnecessary care on religion-mandated medication) instead calling it simply "not an oxymoron."
Zavitova claims to also feel differently about breastfeeding on faithless doctor: the decision not due because breastfeeding will kill the infant - an old claim again.
Last August, three Republican state senators told NBC's Ben Stein via press aide to change statements on California statehood.
We previously learned: former Sen. Bob left the Democrats when health reform's birth control insurance benefits began this Fall.
But what changed, we do believe, is that Governor Deukokupati (former health policy advisor) began openly discussing his thoughts with members to the bill being referred up into the Senate Democratic Caucus in Washington. When California Senator Diane Eu released her remarks stating she had voted No on the bill.
We do continue to learn what Governor's of each Republican Party have spoken up on the bill: but their reasons weren't necessarily "because I had worked in the private sector...and believe its going in exactly the wrong way on healthcare", as is usually assumed as Democrats and their right to take a religious vow under our secularity.
没有评论:
发表评论